On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:46:33AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 10:27 AM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> > On 03/09/2011 03:01 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:10:33PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote:
> >>> @@ -1870,6 +1870,11 @@ static int __ocfs2_change_file_space(struct file 
> >>> *file, struct inode *inode,
> >>>                   goto out_inode_unlock;
> >>>           }
> >>>
> >>> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> >>> +         ret = -EINVAL;
> >>> +         goto out_inode_unlock;
> >>> + }
> >> You might want to move the check into ocfs2_fallocate to mirror what
> >> ocfs2_change_file_space() does. Otherwise, looks like a good catch.
> >>
> > 
> > Tristan pointed out that this check was already in 
> > ocfs2_change_file_space().
> > So this patch should not be required. Am I missing something?
> This patch is needed since the check is in ocfs2_change_file_space. But
> ocfs2_fallocate calls __ocfs2_change_file_space directly.

Right.


> So maybe we should add the check here and remove the check in
> ocfs2_change_file_space?

Either way works for me.
        --Mark

--
Mark Fasheh

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to