Hi Junxiao, So you mean the negotiation you added only happens if all nodes storage link down?
Thanks, Joseph On 2016/1/20 21:27, Junxiao Bi wrote: > Hi Joseph, > >> 在 2016年1月20日，下午5:18，Joseph Qi <[email protected]> 写道： >> >> Hi Junxiao, >> Thanks for the patch set. >> In case only one node storage link down, if this node doesn't fence >> self, other nodes will still check and mark this node dead, which will >> cause cluster membership inconsistency. >> In your patch set, I cannot see any logic to handle this. Am I missing >> something? > No, there is no logic for this. But why didn’t node fence self when storage > down? What make a softirq timer can’t be run, another bug? > > Thanks, > Junxiao. >> >> On 2016/1/20 11:13, Junxiao Bi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This serial of patches is to fix the issue that when storage down, >>> all nodes will fence self due to write timeout. >>> With this patch set, all nodes will keep going until storage back >>> online, except if the following issue happens, then all nodes will >>> do as before to fence self. >>> 1. io error got >>> 2. network between nodes down >>> 3. nodes panic >>> >>> Junxiao Bi (6): >>> ocfs2: o2hb: add negotiate timer >>> ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGO_TIMEOUT message >>> ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGOTIATE_APPROVE message >>> ocfs2: o2hb: add some user/debug log >>> ocfs2: o2hb: don't negotiate if last hb fail >>> ocfs2: o2hb: fix hb hung time >>> >>> fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c | 181 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Junxiao. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ocfs2-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel >>> >>> >> >> > > > . > _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
