Hi, On 11/07/2017 10:43 AM, Changwei Ge wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 2017/11/7 10:33, Eric Ren wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The testing result against the recent kernel looks good. The attachments are >> overall results. If the detailed logs are needed, please let me know. >> >> Pattern Failed Passed Skipped Total >> DiscontigBgMultiNode 0 4 0 4 >> DiscontigBgSingleNode 0 5 0 5 >> MultipleNodes 0 9 1 10 >> SingleNode 0 18 1 19 > 18 SingleNode cases were failed. Is that normal?
It's 18 passed. Sorry, the format is little messy, please see the attachment. > >> Notes: >> - This testing only use blocksize=4096 and clustersize=32768 to reduce the >> time; >> - The 2 skipped cases are on purpose: filecheck and lvb_torture. >> > I wonder why case - 'lvb_torture' is skipped on purpose? We are using fsdlm, unfortunately this test case uses some user space API that fsdlm plugin doesn't implement :) Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
