On 1/25/07, Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is not a fs issue. As in the file must be alright. This is a dlm
issue.
The fs is asking the dlm to free the lock and the dlm is stuck. How many
nodes do you have? We've fixed a bunch of dlm bugs since what you appear
to be running.
theboss: 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp
rack3: 2.6.16-1.2115_FC4smp
rack4: 2.6.16-1.2111_FC4smp
rack5: 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp
rack1: 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp
rack2: 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp
rack6: 2.6.16-1.2111_FC4smp
rack7: 2.6.16-1.2111_FC4smp
rack8: 2.6.16-1.2115_FC4smp
rack9: 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5smp
rack10: 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5smp
monk: 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6
orthogonally, I upgraded a node to FC6, with the latest update kernel
2.6.19-1.2895.fc6. now I can't mount the ocfs2 fs on that very node anymore:
(2917,0):o2net_check_handshake:1093 node rack1 (num 1) at
10.0.2.21:7777advertised net protocol version 2 but 4 is required,
disconnecting
(2917,0):o2net_check_handshake:1093 node rack4 (num 6) at
10.0.2.24:7777advertised net protocol version 2 but 4 is required,
disconnecting
(2917,0):o2net_check_handshake:1093 node rack3 (num 5) at
10.0.2.23:7777advertised net protocol version 2 but 4 is required,
disconnecting
(2917,0):o2net_check_handshake:1093 node theboss (num 3) at
10.0.2.20:7777advertised net protocol version 2 but 4 is required,
disconnecting
(2917,0):o2net_check_handshake:1093 node rack2 (num 4) at
10.0.2.22:7777advertised net protocol version 2 but 4 is required,
disconnecting
OCFS2 1.3.3
audit(1169652682.605:20): avc: denied { search } for pid=3003 comm="
mount.ocfs2" name="ocfs2" dev=debugfs ino=10386
scontext=system_u:system_r:mount_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:debugfs_t:s0 tclass=dir
(3003,0):dlm_request_join:801 ERROR: status = -107
(3003,0):dlm_try_to_join_domain:949 ERROR: status = -107
(3003,0):dlm_join_domain:1201 ERROR: status = -107
(3003,0):dlm_register_domain:1392 ERROR: status = -107
(3003,0):ocfs2_dlm_init:2147 ERROR: status = -107
but I CAN mount a second ocfs2 partition, when this very node is the first
to mount it.
seems like there has been some upgrade to the OCFS protocol, which is not
backward compatible, is it???
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:290677265 SKYPE:d.rossetti
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
