Am 25.04.2008 um 21:53 schrieb Joel Becker: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:40:46PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 06:30:13PM +0200, Christian Lox wrote: >>> >>> Am 25.04.2008 um 18:28 schrieb Sunil Mushran: >>>> That's the first backup. That looks bad... not a good sign. >>>> What about the second backup? It is at offset 4G. >>>> >>> We tried with options -r 1 up to -r 6. >>> Same result. :( >> >> Wouldn't the new mkfs have written new backup superblocks? >> They're not going to help. The only thing I can think of is > > Ok, I assumed the overwrite was with ocfs2, which may not be > correct. What kind of filesystem was written?
According to bashrc it was a simple call of of mkfs', so that should be an ext2. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
