Joel Becker <joel.bec...@oracle.com> 2010-03-05 13:48: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:33:34AM -0600, Brian Kroth wrote: > > As mentioned in the bug (didn't think it was a proper place for > > discussion) I'm also curious more generally about backporting these > > fixes to the 2.6.32 kernel since it's been designated long term stable. > > Is that responsibility just on the individual distro's kernel maintainer > > or are the OCFS2 devs planning on submitting fixes to the mainline > > 2.6.32 tree? > > Who 'designated' it long term stable? I'm just wondering who we > should send our patches to ;-) > > Joel
Fair enough. Here's the most "authoritative" source [1] [2] I can find, though a quick google on "long term stable kernel" produces a number of other results [3]. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/370236/ [2] http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2010.html [3] http://www.fabian-fingerle.de/2010-02-23.233 Thanks, Brian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
