On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:38:04AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:42:19AM +0100, frank wrote:
> > Anyway, if there was a cut in the heartbeat or something similar, one of
> > the nodes should have fenced itself, haven't it? Why did the nodes
> > stall? Can we avoid that?
>
> If both nodes saw the network go down, but the disk heartbeat
> was still working, the higher node should have fenced. Was there no
> fencing? Was it just both nodes hung? How were they hung? All
> operation, or just ocfs2 operations?
Oh, I see. While node 0 was waiting for node 1 to kill itself,
node 1 managed to reconnect. The invalid lock stuff was weird, though.
After this, did all operation resume to normal, or were many operations
permanently frozen?
Joel
--
"Sometimes one pays most for the things one gets for nothing."
- Albert Einstein
Joel Becker
Senior Development Manager
Oracle
E-mail: joel.bec...@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
