Em Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:07:29 -0500 David Johle <djo...@industrialinfo.com> escreveu:
> > >Message: 3 > >Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:22:22 -0300 > >From: S?rgio Surkamp <ser...@gruposinternet.com.br> > > > >One thing to consider when using Unbreakable and iSCSI storage. It > >seems that the multipathd on top of two iSCSI initiators "trick" > >doesn't work on newer kernels. We are using bounded interfaces and > >one initiator on top of the teamed device instead. > > > I am intrigued by this statement. I use RHEL, not OEL, but as you > know they are essentially cousins. > > We have quite a widespread deployment of multipathd on top of > initiator pairs. Been doing this for years now, and many currently > consider it a "best practice" way of setting up a SAN. We also have > other design considerations for which bonded interfaces are less > desirable. > > I would hate to run into a brick wall during a future kernel update > because of some fundamental & recommended functionality no longer > being available. What "newer" kernels have managed to break this, > and do you have any insight as to why? > > Hi, Sorry, but I don't known what breaks the "compatibility" or when it broke. Regards, -- .:''''':. .:' ` Sérgio Surkamp | Gerente de Rede :: ........ ser...@gruposinternet.com.br `:. .:' `:, ,.:' *Grupos Internet S.A.* `: :' R. Lauro Linhares, 2123 Torre B - Sala 201 : : Trindade - Florianópolis - SC :.' :: +55 48 3234-4109 : ' http://www.gruposinternet.com.br _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users