Just a further question, if the documentation is distributed as part of
the package itself under a GPL license then the only issue is the
inclusion of the fixed.texi and/or fixed.txi file within the package
tar-ball. The documentation is delivered with the source files where the
help strings are taken and so there is nominally no GPL violation in
that case.
If its only the issue of the inclusion of fixed.{texi,txi} that is the
issue that is preventing the packages inclusion in debian I have no
objections to including these in the package tar-ball.
D.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
