Hello Xavier and Soren Thank you for your reply. I will at the moment go forward for my octave-3.0.1 release wihout video package.
To Xavier I also agree with Soren's recommendation. Users who use non-latest ffmpeg might be able to use your current package. However new users cannot use your packages so I think that it is better you will go ahead. If the modification will loss the backward compatibility, I can keep the current video package on my web for users who use slightly old binary distribution of the ffmpeg. If you will have finished for video package and you will update the svn of video package, please announce at the octdev mailing list. Regards Tatsuro --- S遵kren Hauberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > man, 05 05 2008 kl. 10:40 -0400, skrev Xavier Delacour: > > I'll prepare a fix for this particular issue (detect in configure, > > support either version). Given their no-release policy, maybe it would > > be better just to track latest sources and require that users build > > against latest (svn) ffmpeg. Or another solution is preferable? > > I think the ffmpeg people encourages you to make a snapshot of their SVN > and include that with your project. I don't know if that's the best > solution, but I think it's the one, they recommend. > > S娼フren > > -------------------------------------- GANBARE! NIPPON! Win your ticket to Olympic Games 2008. http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ganbare-nippon/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
