[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FYI it appears that the octave "downsample" function performs reasonably
> but differently from MATLAB in the third argument, the phase of the
> downsample:
>
> MATLAB: downsample(1:10, 2, 0) ==> [1 3 5 7 9]
>
> OCTAVE: downsample(1:10, 2,0) ==> { barfs }
>
> OCTAVE: downsample(1:10, 2, 1) ==> [1 3 5 7 9]
>
>
> In MATLAB, the meaning of the third argument is a phase offset, not a
> starting index.
>
> Jon
>
>
Ok, I committed a fix that adds one to the phase in upsample and
downsample for compatibility.
D.
--
David Bateman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
