On 06/ott/08, at 15:38, Søren Hauberg wrote:

> man, 06 10 2008 kl. 15:23 +0200, skrev Carlo de Falco:
>> I think the idea of this package is indeed very useful!
>> I tried to generate help pages for some of my packages but they seem
>> to fail (see output below).
>
> Thanks, for trying this out. It seems I'm a bit more agressive about
> texinfo failures than Octave is. I've made some changes and uploaded a
> new version of the package to my web page. With this, the errors are  
> now
> warnings, and your example works.
>
>> Why didn't you commit the package to the svn repository? It would be
>> easier to send patches if you had done so...
>
> Yeah, the reason why I'm holding back, is that I'm still not sure if  
> my
> approach is the right one. Also, I've sent a suggestion to the
> maintainers list about rewriting the help system as m-files. This  
> change
> includes a lot of the same functions as this package. So, if the
> suggestion is accepted, then I guess some confusion as to which  
> version
> of which function to use would appear.

So if I understand, if your suggestion is accepted then your functions  
would
have to be included into octave itself rather yhen OF?
in this case I would suggest to have the HTML pages be built  
automatically by pkg.m
at the time each package is installed or rebuilt so that an user could  
have a local hypertext
with a list of installed packages and links to their html ovrview and  
function help pages,
what do you think?

> Søren

c.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to