Thanks for your kind reply. On 27/11/2008, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luca Favatella wrote: [...] > I didn't feel I was competent in the algorithmes used in gram/lyap to > address your question/bug-fix properly.. So I'd hoped someone else would > respond and help out (vain hope..)... Basically, in that case my feeling > is that the person who is most expert in this code should have free run > of the modifications and make the changes they believe are necessary.. > I'd also say to go for matlab compatiability in the most cases unless > there are good reasons not to. > >> Can you please tell me if you received my previous email? >> If you didn't, can you please suggest me why my email was dropped? > > Its on the list, so it wasn't dropped.. As you are already subscribed as > a developer and no one answered your question, I'd say that means you've > inherited the lyap and gram functions :-)
I committed to svn gram.m with -the test -the short-term fix (i.e. coherence with texinfo) I hope in next weeks I'll contribute more to the control package. I'll do no commit before asking on this list (octave-dev). Cheers, Luca Favatella ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
