søn, 07 12 2008 kl. 14:39 -0500, skrev Roman Stanchak: > IMHO, since Octave is arguably used primarily as an interactive > prototyping tool, it is more valuable to have responsive audio > playback than gapless playback. Users that absolutely need gapless > playback could override the sound_play_utility variable to increase > the audio player buffer size or redirect to a file first.
I guess I somewhat agree with you. That being said, I can imagine problems if Octave generates sounds with gaps. If I was playing sounds from Octave I would do it to ensure that my signal processing hadn't screwed up my signal. If I heard a gap I would be unsure if this was due to a bug in my signal proces code. Perhaps, we could have an optional input argument that sets the size of the blocks in your code. If this is 'Inf' the old code would be used. Does that sound reasonable? Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
