On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Luca Favatella wrote:
> On 06/12/2008, Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi.
>
>
> > when building ga 0.9.4 with Octave 3.0.3, the following errors occur:
> >
> > =====================================================================
> > Checking package...
> [...]
> > [ga]
>
> Most of failing xtests in the ga function are tests related to some
> behaviours that are not "wrong" (because these tests are statistical!)
> but I didn't understand them when I tested the package (in August).
Okay.
So, to summarise, all of these failures are expected :)
Is there a chance to get them less verbose? I just want to be sure that
I don't overlook a serious failure in so much output.
> Please keep this xtest because it is interesting.
I don't intend to remove any test.
> Now you are testing the functions in the ga/doc/old_stuff folder.
Yeah, I realized this later. We have a script checking for tests in all
shipped .m files in the package. That script obviously doesn't
take a location of an .m file into account.
> I understand that it is not clean to put in the public repository not
> working functions, but I decided to put them there to ensure that all
> the work is public.
> Is there a cleaner way to host in the package these "draft functions"?
Putting them in the public repository is fine, no problem. If there's a
way to avoid shipping them in a release, I would appreciate that,
though.
Thanks for the explanation
Thomas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
