søn, 08 03 2009 kl. 10:49 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
> OK, I see the problem. Attached an update.

It looks like it works. Thanks.

> Interesting, but maybe it can't be generalized? I get:
> 
> octave:1> data = rand (10000, 20);
> octave:2> na_data = data; na_data (6, 1) = na_data (7, 2) = NA;
> octave:3> tic, cov (data); toc
> Elapsed time is 0.00816202 seconds.
> octave:4> tic, cov (na_data); toc
> Elapsed time is 0.00428605 seconds.
> octave:5> tic, cov (na_data, "complete"); toc
> Elapsed time is 0.00770807 seconds.
> 
> Do I have a less modern processor?

Interesting indeed. I have a Intel Core 2 Duo Processor P8600 (I think),
but I've seen similar trends on my old laptop. But this is indeed
processor specific. I don't know the details though.

> Hey I thought we were on the list :(
> Agreed with that. Would you like to start the thread?

Yeah, I just realised we weren't on maintainers too. I'll start a
thread.

Søren


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to