On 20-Apr-2009, David Bateman wrote: | This case definitely isn't unique to CLN/GINAC, though my personal | opinion is that the VC++ libraries are part of the compilation process | and if a static build was used there wouldn't be any question so I don't | see why the case is different with the libraries distributed with the | installer. | | In any case from what I understood from this thread the CLN author won't | accept any of our muses as evidence one way or the other and his | position puts in doubt the use of VC++ for any binary GPL distribution, | CLN, Octave or otherwise, so we should bump this to [email protected] | and get a definitive opinion.
It seems there is already a FAQ about this issue: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WindowsRuntimeAndGPL so I still don't understand what the problem is. jwe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
