On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Francisco J. Martínez Serrano
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Francisco J. Martínez Serrano
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Oh, good news everybody, then!
>>>>
>>>> The "only" problem with this function is that it only works for
>>>> integers, if it were to replace setdiff, it should be adapted to work
>>>> with general sets.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't understand what you mean. Exactly what functionality are you 
>>> missing?
>>
>> The stock setdiff does not return the indices (second return value for
>> my setdiff2). It is present, however, in matlab's setdiff.
>>
>
> It does in the development version, as I demonstrated above.

It remains to be seen whether the sparse matrix bug is still present
on the development version.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to