On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:10, Thomas Treichl wrote: > Then (again my opinion) whatever reason it is (I'm a bad guy, isn't > it), the > Doxygen documentation then should also be part of octave.org because > it's an GNU > Octave issue and not an OF issue.
Well, that's not completely true in my opinion. The doxygen docs are there as a guide for writing extensions to Octave using the C++ API and extensions usually go into octave-forge. I see the doxygen docs as a complement to the "Coda" tutorial... > I understand that somebody has to do the work > at the core Octave team, but what is the technical problem if it > would be > accessible via octave.org? And again, who would be the OF maintainer > for keeping > the C++ API documentation up-to-date when a new GNU Octave is > released? Well, the API documentation has until now been more or less kept in sync with the development snapshots rather than with the Octave releases... > *sorry for being me that bad guy ;)* sorry if I sound even worse ;) c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
