søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 01:17 -0400, skrev Carnë Draug:
> Also, you mentioned before that it would be preferable to use octave #
> and #{ to insert comments automatically. Is there any chance that
> octave will ever accept # better than % ?I don't understand the question. Basically, Octave treats '#' and '%' the same way. > Although I from one point I > can understand that we'd like to mark it and use the #, if other users > share their code with matlab users in a regular basis, they might have > problems. Either way, it makes no difference to me. What's your > opinion? I guess the right thing to do is to treat Matlab and Octave as two different languages. It could be implemented fairly simple, by letting the Octave language specification inherit the Matlab language specification. From an end-user point of view, this would, however, not be so great as we would then be forced to choose between using Octave high-lighting or Matlab high-lighting, so I don't like this approach. Basically, I believe that a Free Software project like GtkSourceView should treat Free Software products such as Octave as first-class citizens and proprietary products and as such should have a preference to the Octave way of doing things. Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
