lør, 27 03 2010 kl. 00:02 -0400, skrev Carnë Draug: > This is now fixed.
Thanks! It is really nice to see new contributors; your work is much appreciated. > I also changed the character separator from ":" to "/" since it would > create problems if a ":" were to exist in the filepath. I don't remember why I went with ":" when I wrote this code, so I'll just trust your decision here. > When i was going through the developers instructions, I noticed that, > when referring to new functions, "they should follow Octave > conventions". What are these conventions? Are certain octave functions > preferred than others? Any secret developer handshake that I should be > aware? Well, you do have to dance naked around a bonfire on the 21st of every second month to be a good Octave developer :-) No, seriously, we have some conventions regarding coding style that we recommend. These conventions are not very strict; they are just there to make sure the mostly looks the same, which makes it easier to read for others. You can read appendix D in the Octave manual to get an idea about these conventions. Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
