Carlo de Falco wrote:
> 
> On 28 Apr 2010, at 20:10, Alois Schlögl wrote:
>>
>> Concerning these functions for Matlab users - I'm not sure were else
>> they should go. If you have a suggestion, let me know.
> 
> I don't use much matlab myself, so I am not sure the suggestion makes 
> sense,
> but  what about an "octave_compatibiliy" toolbox for matlab published on
> the matlab file exchange website?
> 
> c.


IMO, providing only the basic compatibility functions would not make 
sense. Users would still need to get the real toolboxes.

Providing all toolboxes (like freetb4matlab) on matlab file exchange is 
not suitable option. So using an additional subdirectory, as suggested 
by Soren, is fine.


Alois







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to