tir, 04 05 2010 kl. 09:01 +0100, skrev Andy Buckle: > I don't think image is the correct package for it. I realise that > matlab has the functions in its image processing toolbox. However, > dicom does mauch more that store images. My current motivation is that > I wish to extract dose-volume histograms from RTDose and geometric > imformation regarding collimators from RTPlan. I guess that mathworks > have bunged it in with image processing in order to keep the number of > packages small. Does octave have a similar requirement?
Well, yes and no. To some extent we have similar requirements. From an Octave-Forge point of view it doesn't really matter how many packages we have. However, from a distributors point of view (Debian, Fedora, ...) I think it matters as the amount of manual labour that has to be done increases with the number of packages. I am not objecting to creating a 'dicom' package, but I think alternatives should at least be considered. Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
