Hi I just added a new function to the image package to calculate the morphological gradient of a image. I called it mmgradm for compatibility with code that used the SDC morphology toolbox. I only made a small change to the syntax that if only SE is defined, it's use in both erosion and dilation.
Is it okay to place it there under that name? Should it be changed to imgrad for similarity with the other morphological operators in the image package? I understand it's a ridiculously simple function but I hope somebody else finds it useful. Carnë ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
