tir, 14 09 2010 kl. 08:42 +0000, skrev Riccardo Corradini:
> >> Personally,
> >>I think it would be best if the code distributed by Prof. James
> LeSage
> >>simply works out of the box in Octave. So, I think you should
> provide
> >>patches directly to Prof. James LeSage whenever his code doesn't
> work
> >>with Octave.
> I do not think that Prof. James LeSage is following the GNU Octave
> development or he is keen on using GNU Octave. So I think he might not
> answer so quickly as we may do on octave-forge on behalf of his
> toolbox.
> >>Also, when you find incompatibilities, please report them
> >>in the Octave bug tracker.
> I agree with you.
> Moreover his toolbox has no license included for Matlab. The inclusion
> of GPL license will allow to fork it with for instance my MPI
> bindings. This would be quite complex to explain on his web site. 
> Am I clear? Is it still confusing you?
> Thanks a lot

I apologise for the late reply (things are really hectic for me, so
there is little time for Octave).

If Prof. LeSage is not willing to accept the changes you would like to
make (MPI, etc.) and you are willing to maintain a fork here at
Octave-Forge then I am not against this. In general, I think forking is
bad unless it is truly needed. But I am not in a position to decide what
is reasonable in the given situation, so I'll have to let you decide.

Søren


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to