Hi, The concerned package maintainer contacted me directly and told me he is going to revisit it as soon as possible. It is actually just a couple of lines that were changed, not sure why diff gave such a patch though.
Thanks for contacting again though. On 11/27/2010 10:15 AM, Søren Hauberg wrote: > Hi > > I'm sorry about the late reply. > > fre, 22 10 2010 kl. 19:46 -0400, skrev py: >> I am not sure if I am sending in the fix at the right place, but I >> discovered a bug (really a corner case that has not been handled) in the >> nnet package. >> >> I am attaching both the error and the patch I think should fix it. >> Please let me know if I it looks fixed. > I don't know this function well enough to determine if your patch is > correct or not. The patch seems rather involved to me (you change > practically every line in the file); would it be possible to simplify > it? If not, would it at least be possible to provide a patch with fewer > changes (e.g. you shouldn't be changing the license)? > > Søren > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
