Juan,
1. Please reply BELOW the message or below relevant message parts (i.e., no top posting, please) 2. see below Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > Ok, for the moment the warnings can be ignored and in case of doubt I > will use the core functions. > Thank you very much, Simply delete the relevant script files from the packages they belong to (see ./share/octave/packages/<package-name-version>/..... ) As for the io package, dlmread/-write, csvread/-write and textread will be dropped in the next release as soon as octave-3.4 will be out (they are core octave versions now). Currently I'm struggling to get the java pkg installed with octave-3.3.54, implying the spreadsheet scripts don't work with 3.3.54 anyway so AFAICS there's little use for io pkg with octave-3.3.54 at this moment. Philip > JPi > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Søren Hauberg<[email protected]> wrote: >> ons, 15 12 2010 kl. 09:06 +0100, skrev Olaf Till: >>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:27:37AM +0100, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> Using Octave 3.3.54, every time it starts I get the following warnings: >>>> warning: function ~/octave/specfun-1.0.9/erfcx.m shadows a built-in >>>> function >>>> warning: function ~/octave/optim-1.0.12/fminbnd.m shadows a core >>>> library function >>>> warning: function ~/octave/statistics-1.0.10/fstat.m shadows a core >>>> library function >>>> warning: function ~/octave/statistics-1.0.10/prctile.m shadows a core >>>> library function >>>> warning: function ~/octave/io-1.0.13/csvread.m shadows a core library >>>> function >>>> warning: function ~/octave/io-1.0.13/csvwrite.m shadows a core library >>>> function >>>> warning: function ~/octave/io-1.0.13/dlmwrite.m shadows a core library >>>> function >>>> warning: function >>>> ~/octave/io-1.0.13/i686-pc-linux-gnu-api-v37/textread.oct shadows a >>>> core library function >>>> warning: function ~/octave/juanpi_files/comet.m shadows a core library >>>> function >>>> >>>> Is this the expected behavior? Since apparently there are overlaping >>>> functions in the core and the packages, how to know which ine is the >>>> right one in terms of bugs, efficiency, etc...? >>> >>> You can't know. But if there is a core function, I would try it first. >>> >>> Seemingly these packages are not yet adapted to the development >>> version of Octave you are running. As for optim, current packaged >>> version 1.0.15 does not contain fminbnd anymore. >> >> Basically, the packages have not been adapted to the development version >> of Octave. In the old days we did our best to ensure optimal performance >> with the current stable release. These days, it's really the package >> maintainer that decides the recommended version of Octave for the >> specific package. >> >> Søren >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
