Yes,
we will concentrate on the windows side later, in order to find the best 
way to include it in the octave windows installer.
I think it would not be a problem. Bye the way, the -lpthread allows to 
compile without any error, but when you try to execute the
function (at runtime), there is an octave error about a missing dependency.

@Carlo: my SF username: gianvito . My colleague SF username: Piero Molino.

Thank you.


Il 04/02/2011 10:45, Benjamin Lindner ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>> any news for us?
> Sorry for the late reply, I followed the thread back to get
> up-to-date, I hope I got everything on the way here.
>
> I'm currently busy with octave itself, and I'll get on the the forge
> packages when it's finished.
> So you'll have to be a little patient...
>
> IIRC, you'd like the package to be also included in the octave windows
> installer, correct?
> For this, it must be buildable with the set of tools that ship with
> the installer.
>
> I took a look at your makefile, and am not sure this will work as-is.
> Is your code supposed to build also on a non-windows platform? because
> you specify -lpthreadVC2 only for windows. (I suppose the COMSPEC
> check is the equivalent of 'if building on windows')
>
> Why is pthreadVC2 needed (emphasis on the 'VC2' ?)
>
> Besides, there is no need to ship with a pthreads library for windows,
> as gcc for windows (>4.5.0) ships with a pthread library (both the
> mingw32 and the mingw64 one, gcc, that is) - but it's called simply
> -lpthreads.
>
> benjamin
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
rules translate into the virtual world? 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to