On 29 Jun 2011, at 09:16, Olaf Till wrote: > I'm not ready, but: > > Your example with cell2cell works for me, too:
is your version of cell2cell the same as in the repository? > octave:5> function prova () >> m = 1; n = 1; >> plabels = cell2cell (num2cell ((1:n).'), 1); >> m >> endfunction > octave:6> prova > m = 1 > octave:7> > > Which Octave version do you use? mercurial sources cloned and built yesterday > And your patch seems to change much. Could you make it easier for me > and tell me what was the change which is needed to fix the supposed > bug, and what was actually wrong before? sorry, I got carried away with changing indentation ;) The problem seemed to be cell2cell exiting at a poit where it would leave Octave's state garbled. In order to debug this I tried to rewrite the structure of the code so to have a single return (which is the suggested Octave coding style). This alone seemed to do the trick for me so I submitted the patch ;) > Olaf c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
