On 2/15/12 2:15 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 15 February 2012 18:19, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> When packaging Octave Forge packages for Fink, I have been removing
>> functions that shadow identically-named functions in Octave core, since
>> normally the situation has been that the package is older than the
>> particular Octave release (e.g. 3.4.3 or 3.6.0), and I assumed that
>> these functions had been subsumed into Octave core in identical form.
>>
>> Would it be preferable for me _not_ to do this, however?
> 
> Some packages shadow core functions on purpose. This is the case of
> fstat in statistics and great part of the NaN package.
> 
>> Or maybe only
>> do it when the m-file or oct-file in a package is _identical_ to what is
>> in Octave core?  I'll admit that I didn't do exhaustive testing of
>> whether what I was removing was indeed identical to what was in core.
> 
> I guess every case is a case. If you could report every case on the
> mailing list we could help looking into it and at the same time we'd
> become aware of this. This is specially true for packages without
> maintainer that haven't seen a new release in a long time.
> 
> Carnë

Aha, those were some of the exact cases that came to mind.  I'll restore
them to their respective packages.

Thanks.

-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
http://finkakh.wordpress.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to