+1 on the human participation piece. Absolutely critical.
On 6/19/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alex Boisvert wrote: > > We're open to bringing Tempo under the Apache umbrella if there's > > sufficient interest. It would be a good step towards building a > > more complete BPM solution at Apache. > > Personally, I consider support for human participation in workflows to be > vital, so I'd be in favor of accepting a contribution to further that > goal. I think there's still several pieces missing to get a solid set of BPM bricks in the ASF. ODE is just the first part but I'd personally like to see the following pieces implemented and made to work together: - a web service orchestration engine (ODE) - human participation (could be Tempo) - small footprint, embeddable process execution environment, addressing the "programming in the small" set of problems (ala jbpm) There's much more than that to BPM but that's a lot of work already and we can't dilute ourselves too much. However I think that's what we should push for. Matthieu
