On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ian C <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Rob, >>>>> >>>>> This is too bad. Someone will need to step up and take over minding JIRA >>>>> as currently all issues are assigned to Devin. >>>>> >>>> >> I don't know the details of JIRA and like everyone have limited time, >> but I am would be happy to get involved. >> > > Hi Ian, > > JIRA is the easy part. It is an issue tracker. We report newly found > bugs there, and there is a simple workflow to take through through the > various stages, for example New -> Open -> In Progress -> Resolved -> > Closed. > > You should be able to to sign up for an account here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa > Thanks, I am signed up.
>> I am very interested in the ODFToolkit and looking to contribute. >> > > Cool. What kind of things are you interested in working on? I emailed in another thread some ideas related to the code generator. > > For coding work, there are a number of unassigned issues. You could > look at any one of them. > > Another idea would be to try to get some 'code coverage' reports on > our existing JUnit tests, and see where we are missing tests and add > new ones. That could be a good way of getting more familiar with the > code base. > > Also, our documentation, both on the website and the JavaDoc could use > editing. > > Plenty of other things to do, depending on your interests. Cool, thanks, I will look around. Do I need any Apache formalities to be sorted first? > >> I have worked with a number of different ticketing systems over the >> years, this can't be that different. >> > > They are all variations on the same concepts. > Indeed >> Contact me directly if interested, >> > > I'm cc'ing you on this note, but hopefully you will subscribe to and > follow this mailing list. It doesn't get a lot of traffic, but it is > where the project does its work. > > If you are not subscribed, you can do so by sending a note to: > [email protected] Yep, already subscribed. > > Regards, > > -Rob >> >>>> For now I changed the default assignment for new issues to "unassigned". >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>>> Unfortunately that didn't seem to fix any of the bugs <g> >>> >>> Nor did it hold off any Spammers... >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -Rob >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> As several of you know, Devin has moved on to a new job within IBM. >>>>>> That's why were not seeing as much of him on the list anymore. He >>>>>> handed off to me his encryption work, and it looks in pretty good >>>>>> shape. I do still need to adjust a couple unit tests (in >>>>>> org.odftoolkit.odfdom.pkg.LoadSaveErrorTest) but otherwise this looks >>>>>> clean. >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes are made to ODFDOM and the Simple API. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to get this code checked in before the trunk diverges more. >>>>>> >>>>>> If anyone else wants to review the patch before I check it in, let me >>>>>> know. Otherwise I'll plan on committing this enhancement next week. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Rob >>>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> >> Ian C -- Cheers, Ian C
