I think keeping things up to date is a good idea. Which Java version are we aiming it at?
I run on Fedora and Windows occasionally, if I can make the time I can test there to see if that would be useful? On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > I went through our POM's to see if we had any dependencies that were > worth updating. Here's a quick summary of what I found. > > The following are up to date: > > ant-nodeps 1.8.1 > java-rdfa 0.4.2 > commons-validator 1.4.0 > > The following have newer versions available, with the newer version in > parentheses: > > xercesImpl 2.9.1 (2.11) > junit 4.8.1 (4.11) > jena-arq 2.9.4 (2.11.0) > jena-core 2.7.4 (2.11.0) > maven-compiler-plugin 2.3.2 (3.1) > maven-javadoc-plugin 2.7 (2.9.1) > maven-source-plugin 2.1.2 (2.2.1) > maven-assembly-plugin ? (2.4) > apache-rat-plugin ? (0.1.0) > maven-gpg-plugin 1.1 (1.4) > maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta-9 (2.4.2) > > It probably is safe to update the build-time tools (junit, rat and the > maven plugins), yes? > > What about the run time dependencies? > > -Rob > -- Cheers, Ian C
