> Chris Howe wrote: > > David, > > > > Tonality is difficult to construe from email, I'll > > admit, but the wording of your reprimand of Si's date > > format commit, has to make one suspect that you see > > yourself in that light as well. > > > > Sincerely speaking, I'd love to get more feedback on my work from David, > because of his great experience and knowledge of OFBiz and ERP > processes; unfortunately this is not possible since reviewing the work > from others is very difficult and time consuming and he is not payed to > perform this task. > > I don't think that the comment on Si's commit can be considered a > reprimand; it was just a quick review on a commit. > > It is worth saying that this can be considered a very good example of > common practices described and promoted by the Apache Software Foundation: > > 1) Si did a commit following the CTV "Commit Then Review" startegy: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#CommitThenReview > > 2) David expressed a veto for this change: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Veto > > No dictatorship, just best practices adopted (in a natural way) by an > healthy and solid open source project like OFBiz is. > > Jacopo
Thank-you Jacopo to help us to find this that each should read (if willing to participate at this project) Jacques
