I know that means something to you, but does not convey much to me.
At least as far as how you see Objects in Entities.
At this point not trying to get into weather they should or should not
be changed, just the semantics.
Chris Howe sent the following on 7/23/2006 8:56 AM:
ie BillingAccountRole, ProductCategoryRole,
BudgetRole, InvoiceRole, etc
--- BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I read about "OBJECT", from a programming point
of view, I have an
entirely different perspective than the Entity
Definition In the Data
model books they are based on.
So could you define your terms, maybe give an
example of what this is about.
It would help for clearer communication, IMHO.
Chris Howe sent the following on 7/22/2006 11:38 PM:
In the wiki http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/ZAE , I have
listed all of the entities that do not comply with
the
ObjectRole entity approach of showing a
relationship
between a party and an object.
Some of these implementations may be just fine.
Some
of the implementations may have been done before
utilization of the ObjectRole type of entity.
Some of
these entities may not make sense to use the
ObjectRole approach.
Whatever the case, I would appreciate any feedback
on
each of these entities that knowledgable people
can
offer.
Once it is determined that the ObjectRole entity
would
be a better approach for an entity, we can make a
JIRA
issue for it and tackle the upgrade.
Thanks all!
