David,
I think in most languages, even if a structure is deprecated, they
would still support bug fixes and what not.
In general regarding releases,
1. I agree we should fix the Derby/PostgreSQL issue. Did you have a
chance to look at it? If not we'll try to get to it at some point.
2. I agree that maintaining stable-feature releases would be more
work, but that's something I'm willing to help with. I don't want to
impose too much additional burden on everybody else. I think if we
could just all share more information about what we're working on,
that'd be great.
Si
On Jul 27, 2006, at 11:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Okay, I think I see what you are saying. I'm not sure if I like the
change though... If we do it for field-to-field we would really need
to do it for field-to-env, env-to-field, and env-to-env. My hope for
those fields is to get them totally removed from the simple-method
language. They are already "deprecated" and you'll get log warnings
if you use them. They are really old and stem from the days before
the FlexibleStringExpander and FlexibleMapAccessor were implemented.
In this spirit it may me good that everybody seing these deprecated
warning change these calls for set calls. This will clear the
log a littlle bit
TIA
Jacques
I may be missing something though... If there is a reason I'm missing
why we really can't let this dead dog lie, please let me know.
-David
On Jul 27, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Si Chen wrote:
The particular issue is marked as resolved by re-writing the
service in question, but the patch for field-to-field typecasting
was never put back into minilang, so other services would break.
Si
On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:29 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Si Chen wrote:
On the issue of stability:
1. I propose that we put this http://jira.undersunconsulting.com/
browse/OFBIZ-500 back into the main code base. It addressed a
typecast issue with field-to-field.
I just took a look at this issue and it seems to be closed and
acknowledged as resolved. Is there something I'm missing?
-David
