Title: Message
It reminds me of the disclaimer at the end of the film "Bad Taste" - instead of the usual legalese saying "any similarity to real persons or institutions.." etc it just says
 "Any similarity with persons living or dead is an accident.  Sorry"
 
 

John Bird

email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Consultant for Beyond Data Systems/Acclipse Legal

Ph land (03)384-4527  mobile (027)484-4528

92 Soleares Ave, Mt Pleasant

Christchurch

Web www.123.co.nz/johnbird

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilkin, Kurt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 5:23 PM
To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Offtopic List
Subject: RE: [DUG-Offtopic] RE: [DUG] EDS dumps Rational for Borland

The company one? It's auto appended to outgoing mail and I can't be shagged arguing.
Using Outlook is ignominious enough, the sig's neither here nor there to me,
and seeing as we've got a compliance *department*, and speaking as 
someone who sent *1* rich text email message in 2 years at a marketing
company, I'm leaving them windmills to someone else.
 
But uh-oh : you've started the Outlook rant : for crying out loud the poxy
thing *deliberately* breaks email etiquette:
You can't avoid top posting on a rich text message.
And plain text messages don't get '>' quoted properly.
 
Mostly, though, I /miss/ *mozilla's* _plain_ text formatting :)
 
Anyone know if Moz can connect to an Exchange server?
 
 
Cheers, and oh the humanity, Kurt.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Levis
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2004 3:52 p.m.
To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Offtopic List
Subject: Re: [DUG-Offtopic] RE: [DUG] EDS dumps Rational for Borland

No one reads sigs longer than 1 or 2 lines of larger size text, so in effect it is useless and just adds to bandwidth congestion.  Here is a replacement sig:
 

If anyone gets the wrong end of the stick, that's your problem.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:38 PM
Subject: [DUG-Offtopic] RE: [DUG] EDS dumps Rational for Borland

Gary, don't know if you read OT, but I'm swiping your .sig :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary T. Benner
Sent: Monday, 29 November 2004 4:02 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DUG] EDS dumps Rational for Borland

This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential and intended for the named recipient's use only. If you are not the intended recipient (i) do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way, (ii) please let us know by return email immediately then destroy the message, and any hard copies of the message, and any attachments. The sender of this message is not responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments and/or connection linkages to the Internet referred to in this message after it has been sent. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message and/or attachments is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to buy or sell securities or derivatives at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to separate formal written notification. Where reference is made to research material and/or research recommendations, the basis of the provision of such research material and/or recommendations is set out in the relevant disclaimer.

 
_______________________________________________
Offtopic mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/offtopic

Reply via email to