On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:26:04 -0300, Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Marcel is right. Here I fake most AT commands like +CFUN to make DUN >> > client happy. We don't need to power on/off real modem at all. See >> > gatchat/test-server.c for similar implementation. >> >> That depends much what you're trying to achieve. If you only care about >> Dial-Up Networking, that might work. But if you care about passing > various >> some kinds of certification testing, AT commands _must_ work > _correctly_. >> >> So I doubt oFono will get away with this in the medium term. > > we are clearly and on purpose splitting Bluetooth Dialup support from > generic Serial Port Profile support. > > For the serial port for certification testing you will NOT be able to > use dialup channel.
I think it's quite the opposite. In my understanding, some tests do require DUN. Obviously you loose the ability to send AT commands while PPP is active. > Also I doubt that you wanna do the certification testing over Bluetooth. Sure, but that's hardly relevant. I assume oFono will need to support both BlueTooth and USB, not just BlueTooth. I don't see any reason why it would have two different AT server implementations. (As a side note, N900 does use the exact same AT commands server for USB CDC ACM and BT DUN.) > I assume that will most likely be done via USB Yes. > with the device in some special R&D mode. No. Except for possibly being inside a Faraday cage, there's nothing special. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
