Hi Jeevaka, On 09/20/2010 07:39 AM, jeevaka.badrap...@elektrobit.com wrote: > Hi, > >> Of course, one can argue whether this feature really has some real >> world relevance or is purely theoretical. >> >> I wonder if it is a type approval requirement to support? > >> I'm afraid there is a PICS case for this thing. I cannot recall how we > got N900 through this particular hoop, but probably we just waived this > particular test case irrelevant. > > correct. There is a USIM conformance case on this message capacitiy > exceeded information. As per the 3GPP 31.121 specification section 8.2: > > "If all SMS data field are full and furthermore all memory capacity > reserved for SMS inside the ME is filled up to maximum and a SM(Short > Message) was rejected, then this shall be indicated in the SMS Status > file.(EFsmss)"
The thing is, oFono configures SMS for direct delivery (e.g. no SM/ME storage). And even if direct delivery does not work (e.g. crappy modem or Class 2 / Class 3 messages) oFono still removes the SMS as soon as it is delivered. We should never hit a sim/me memory full conditions. So I don't see how this test case even applies. Regards, -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
