Hi Aki, On 12/09/2010 12:52 AM, Aki Niemi wrote: > Hi Denis, > > 2010/12/3 Denis Kenzior <denk...@gmail.com>: >> Out of curiosity, how do you plan to support this on AT modems? I have >> yet to see any AT modem report the NITZ network name via a proprietary >> command. > > Are you sure? In my experience, the NITZ name may be received moments > after registration, so it would make sense to have an unsolicited > notification of it.
The NITZ notification does indeed arrive unsolicited. However, no AT modem that I know of reports the received NITZ name. This is only reported via COPS. The best you can do is call COPS again after the driver reports ofono_netreg_time_notify. > >> Besides, all AT modems report the NITZ name via COPS. So in effect >> oFono already fulfills this task... > > Well, not with ISI modems it doesn't. Also, if we move PLMN name > handling over to oFono, how can you determine if the name reported by > COPS is indeed the NITZ name and as such should take precedence over > the core's PLMN name? Hence the reason for my pointed questions. I'm a big proponent of moving the PLMN database to the core, however this needs to work for both ISI and AT modems. Regards, -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
