Hi Sjur, > > I thought that we came to the conclusion that CID=0 is pretty much a > > really bad idea. So I would prefer that your modem is actually not using > > CID=0 ever. > Yea, I know you or Denis said so, but I'm not sure we understood your > concern...
I really thought it became pretty much clear during the discussion that introducing a CID=0 that is just special on LTE is a pretty much bad idea. As long as CID=0 concept does not exist in GSM/UMTS, you should not make LTE a special case. It will not fit and just makes things utterly complex for the telephony stack to figure out when contexts are moved from LTE to GSM/UMTS. If CID=0 is not valid for GSM/UTMS then you are in big trouble to make this work properly. And if it is valid, then there is no difference between it being CID=0 or any other CID. So please step away from the CID=0 idea and just give the next free CID to the network activated context. And per specification the CID start with 1. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
