Hi Paulo, [sorry for the late response, was on vacation]
On 03/25/2013 03:43 PM, Paulo Borges wrote:
Hi Daniel, On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Wagner <w...@monom.org <mailto:w...@monom.org>> wrote: Hi Paulo, I have pushed all patches except patch #3. "dun_gw: Add BlueZ 5 version" from Frédéric just added recently the definition for DUN_GW_UUID. Obviously, I needed to update your patches to use DUN_GW_UUID instead of DUN_UUID. The bluez4.c file also uses DUN_GW_UUID as identifier. Thanks a lot, daniel Actually, DUN profile is "asymmetric": it doesn't have an UUID for each role, they share the same UUID [1]. The only way to distinguish the current role is to specify it when registering the profile with bt_register_profile_with_role function. Specifying the role when registering a DUN profile is important because only GW should expose a SDP record. [1] https://www.bluetooth.org/Technical/AssignedNumbers/service_discovery.htm
I see. The thing I wanted to avoid is to have twice a define for the same value. In the end the way how the define is used (as you have described above) is essential.
cheers, daniel _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
