Hi, Could I get a clarification on the behaviour you see here?
As I understand it, the SARA-R4 doesn't support the CGDATA command. That's fine as ofono will detect this and set use_atd99 in order to force the use of the ATD command as a fallback.
Why do you need to force this setting in the below patch? Does the CGDATA command not return ERROR? What does it return?
Thanks, Jonas On 15/02/2019 13:11, philippedesw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Philippe De Swert <philippe.desw...@digitalistgroup.com> QUIRCK: For some reason I really need to force the use of the atd99 command here. --- drivers/atmodem/gprs-context.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/atmodem/gprs-context.c b/drivers/atmodem/gprs-context.c index 93894efd..a0776f2a 100644 --- a/drivers/atmodem/gprs-context.c +++ b/drivers/atmodem/gprs-context.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void at_cgdcont_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data) return; }- if (gcd->use_atd99)+ if (gcd->use_atd99 || gcd->vendor == OFONO_VENDOR_UBLOX) sprintf(buf, "ATD*99***%u#", gcd->active_context); else sprintf(buf, "AT+CGDATA=\"PPP\",%u", gcd->active_context); @@ -457,6 +457,9 @@ static int at_gprs_context_probe(struct ofono_gprs_context *gc, case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM_SIM900: gcd->use_atd99 = FALSE; break; + case OFONO_VENDOR_UBLOX: + gcd->use_atd99 = TRUE; + break; default: g_at_chat_send(chat, "AT+CGDATA=?", cgdata_prefix, at_cgdata_test_cb, gc, NULL);
_______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
