Peter Tribble wrote: > As I understand it, each community group has a matching electorate collective. > Yes. > What's the rule for granting write access to the data in those > electorate collectives? > Facilitators would be most efficient mechanism to handle this data entry task for their CGs. > Presumably *not* the same as for the auth data in the regular collective. > Correct. Leaders would not have access to the Electorate data. Only Facilitators. > I think the scheme is fine; my concern would be ensuring that only "approved" > users (presumably the facilitators would be) can edit the data - The constitution says that the OGB appoints the CG Facilitators, so, presumably, they would be approved by the board. > and presumably > the OGB secretary would get update access to everything, just in case a > facilitator is unavailable for whatever reason. We could consider granting the OGB secretary access to the individual Electorates as an RFE for next year. In the meantime, if a Facilitator is not available to enter the data, we can make the update manually on our end until the OGB appoints a new Facilitator or the current Facilitator becomes available. > And presumably there's a log > that's accessible so that we can review who's done what. > A log can be provided, but as I explained earlier the relationships data will be displayed in the open shortly. So, that would include CG-P sponsor relationships, Contributors, Core Contributors, etc.
Jim
