JimG wrote:
> Personally, I think Project status is a far more desirable state than being
> a Community Group.
It sounds like there are good reasons for an appliances <something> to
continue to exist in some form.
>From the discussion, it sounds like this group's needs are:
High: Email/forum channel for announcements
Medium: Web page(s) for collection of information
(but who maintains?)
Low: os.o community governance and oversight
Low: Active "on os.o" development projects
Very Low: Core Contributors
I agree with Jim - this sounds like a project with mailing lists and
no source repository (for now). Until (if?, when?) we get the new
constitution in place, it could be hosted by the OGB as an at-large
project if a better home isn't found first.
The one thing I wouldn't do is wipe it out completely, since there is
activity and interest in the subject matter...
-John
