On 03/06/09 10:47, Michelle Olson wrote: > Jim Grisanzio wrote: >> John Beck wrote: >>> Jim> I'd like to suggest to the OGB that we allow these 4 grants in >>> because >>> Jim> they had been in the queue but were delayed due to the bug in >>> poll and >>> Jim> we also need to consider that the website has had very serious >>> issues >>> Jim> the last week and a half (in fact, we've never had website >>> issues as bad >>> Jim> as this) which has stressed everything. In other words, since >>> the OGB >>> Jim> decided to not stick to the original deadline due to the poll >>> bug, now >>> Jim> things are backed up and exacerbated even further by the >>> infrastructure >>> Jim> problems with the site. I'm not saying we should let in /new/ >>> grants, but >>> Jim> I think we should finalize the grants that were already in the >>> queue. >>> >>> Simon> It's plausibly against the current Constitution, so it >>> depends on how >>> Simon> people feel about it. Personally I would say that since the >>> process >>> Simon> was all followed and they are simply missing from the electronic >>> Simon> representation of the list and not from the OGB's communications >>> Simon> traffic they could be added in. >>> >>> Yes, I thought we all agreed that grant extensions, especially those >>> caused >>> by the bug in the database and those where the Right Thing had >>> happened on >>> time but the update was delayed, be allowed. At any rate, I am OK >>> with this. >>> >> >> Can we finalize this? >> >> Jim > Hi Jim, > > I'm working on it, will get these added today.
Ok, advocacy core contributor grants have been added for the 4 that I missed last week, lasarux, mmca13, hecsa, xapiens, and also alhopper which failed last week due to a separate bug. Thanks for your patience, Michelle > > -M > _______________________________________________ > ogb-discuss mailing list > ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
