On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:06:15PM -0700, John Plocher wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Alan Hargreaves
> <Alan.Hargreaves at sun.com> wrote:
> > It is now well into the period for voting. I note that we have two
> > candidates who it appears have not submitted a candidate statement.
>
> I responded with my opinion on IRC at 9:43pm this evening:
>
> plocher: Re: candidates w/o statements: I believe (and it is a good
> topic for Wed's OGB meeting) that this disqualifies them. What that
> does for ballots witht heir names/numbers on them is unknown. (I
> would like to believe that they "dissapear" and everyone under them
> moves up one spot.
The current Constitution (paragraph 6.3) only requires a statement of
commercial affiliations, but it does state that it must be published
before voting commences.
It also states that the ballot must be complete at least seven days
before voting begins and we only allowed six days and one minute.
Finally, it looks like I'm ineligible too as I failed to attest to my
Statement's accuracy, unless my making the statement counts as an
implicit attestation (which it probably doesn't).
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20090316/5a9a786c/attachment.bin>
