>Dennis Clarke wrote: > >>> I know of no country who has a threshold on the number of votes; the >>> reason is simple: must the current governemnt stay when not enough people >>> vote? No, terms end and even if only one person votes he gets to decide >>> the new government. >> >> That is correct but it is not called democracry. It is called fascism. > >Nonsense I think - that would be "voter apathy", assuming that the elections >were "free and fair" and that many more could have voted than did, but were >not prevented from voting etc.
Indeed; when Dennis decries is fascism is what happen in when what in Nazi Germany; there were two ways to vote: in secret, or publicly.[1] There's the rub: the Nazi's said that THEIR supporters would do so publicly. Fortunately, our ballot is secret. Another reasons why you shouldn't allow Internet voting. Uhm, wait, that didn't came out right. Casper [1] Clearly Godwin doesn't apply here.
