I received the following comment from a group of community members:

Begin forwarded message:

>> My team read through the constitution together and had the  
>> following comments:
>>
>> 1.2 Roles
>>
>> It is not clear how Leaders are "bootstrapped". Leaders appoint  
>> other leaders but who appoints the initial leaders.
>>
>> 1.3 Group Management Processes
>>
>> The constitution says that the process for assigning roles is based  
>> upon
>> a meritocracy but there is no specific mechanism to guarantee his.  
>> Based on our reading it seems that leaders appoint other leaders.  
>> The general group members may not accept that leader.
>>
>> We did not that there is the clause that allows sanctions including  
>> exclusion to be applied to community members.
>>
>> 2. Community Elections
>>
>> We noted that there is no mention of an appeals or recount process  
>> or any other recourse if an election is disputed.
>>
>> 2.1.2 Quorum
>>
>> There was some question about the working of the sentence:
>>
>>      "Quorum for an Election shall be met by one-third of the total
>>      Electorate Group members participating in the election."
>>
>> while it was generally understood, it is felt that it could be  
>> worded more
>>    clearly, e.g.:
>>
>>      "Quorum for an Election shall be met by the participation in the
>>      election of one-third of the total Electorate Group members"
>>
>> 3.3 Candidates
>>
>> We weren't too sure on this one but we had a question about whether  
>> it would be possible to bias an election. An individual could  
>> nominate themselves and then nominate other candidates who would  
>> become voting members. Those other members could then vote for the  
>> original candidate.
>>
>>
>> 3.4 Removal from office and Vacancies
>>
>> What is meant by "Signing" in terms of gaining  10% of of the  
>> Electorate membership to sign a petition. Is a written signature  
>> required?
>>
>>
>> Finally, there were some typos found:
>>
>> 1.2 Roles
>>
>>  A Contributor: ... with the goals of a that group ...
>>
>>  should read
>>
>>  A Contributor: ... with the goals of that group ...
>>
>>
>> 1.4 Electorate Group
>>
>>
>>  The Electorate Group ... who have substantially and  
>> verifiability ...
>>
>>  should read
>>
>>  The Electorate Group ... who have substantially and verifiably ...
>>
>> 3.1 Duties
>>
>>  Board members help ... and doing as much possible ...
>>
>>  should read
>>
>>  Board members help ... and doing as much as possible ...
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20090225/04f27afe/attachment.html>

Reply via email to