Don Cragun <don.cragun at sun.com> wrote:

> >BTW: Regarding our talk... I checked the POSIX standard and it turns out 
> >that od(1) support for UTF-8 "chars" is fully optional. There is no need to
> >support it. 
> >
> >
> >
> >J?rg
>
> Joerg,
>       This is only partly true.

Please also comment Rolands claim that UNICODE is not a lossless coding.
Roland mentioned this recently without giving evidence.

I can hardly believe that the 21 bit coding used by UNICODE still has problems 
to map other codings. UNICODE has been designed to be a lossless coding....

J?rg

-- 
 EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js at cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de     (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Reply via email to